Judge In Rittenhouse Case Calls for ‘Competent Testimony’ After Hearing Prosecution’s Explanation For Withheld Evidence

Judge In Rittenhouse Case Calls for ‘Competent Testimony’ After Hearing Prosecution’s Explanation For Withheld Evidence

Judge Bruce Schroeder, after watching the prosecution’s painful explanation for withholding high-resolution video evidence in the Rittenhouse case, has called for “competent testimony” to be “taken under oath” to explain the screw-up.

The judge is deliberating whether or not to rule the Rittenhouse case a “mistrial with prejudice” after the defense’s motion pointed out the state had withheld potentially exculpatory evidence that could clear its client.

The defense team’s motion was shared by Human Events Senior Editor Jack Posobiec on late Tuesday night. It reveals the prosecutorial misconduct that would potentially lead to a “mistrial with prejudice.”

Will Maxwell spill dirt on the Clintons?*
This poll gives you free access to our premium politics newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The motion argues that the state has “repeatedly violated instructions from the Court, acted in bad faith and intentionally provided technological evidence which was different from theirs.”

In closing, the motion stated that the “defendant respectfully requests the Court find “prosecutorial overreaching” existed, that “overreaching was intentional and in bad faith,” and thereby grant the defendant’s motion for a mistrial with prejudice.

Continue Reading On Trending Politics >>>